In Roche v. Aetna, Inc., No. 16-1712 (3rd Cir. 2017) (Non Precedential Decision), Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), a health care plan administrator, took the position that Michelle Roche, a plan member, had to reimburse it for medical expenses it paid on behalf of Roche under the relevant benefits plan (since Roche settled with the tortfeasor who injured her, giving rise to those medical expenses). Roche reimbursed Aetna but then filed this action, contending that she should not have had to reimburse Aetna. The district court concluded that, before filing this action, Roche needed to exhaust her administrative remedies, and denied her claim. On appeal, Roche argues that she was not required to exhaust those remedies.
Upon review, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Court”) held that, because the plan unambiguously requires Roche to exhaust her remedies-which she apparently did not do- the Court will affirm the judgment of the district court.